Bug 50880
Summary: | Photos from negatives much to pale with Epson Perfection 1240U | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Inger Karin Haarbye <inger> |
Component: | sane-backends | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.3 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-08-04 11:30:09 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Inger Karin Haarbye
2001-08-04 10:53:49 UTC
Has a previous version of SANE given you better results from scanning, or has this bug always been present? I've just been told that no SANE front end yet does proper orange mask correction for negatives, so the SANE developers know about this issue. In the mean time, this page might help: http://www.freecolormanagement.com/color/gimp_negative_scanning.html No, previous version of sane has been no better than this. I was not aware of the problem with orange mask correction. I have tried your advice on http://www.freecolormanagement.com/color/gimp_negative_scanning.html but I still don't get a very good result. So - I think I still have to use Win2000 for this (I don't use win for anything else...). |