Bug 510307

Summary:	gvim spews messages about gtk_form_set_static_gravity
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev>
Component:	vim	Assignee:	Karsten Hopp <karsten>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	12	CC:	azelinka, bogado, cg, felipe.contreras, hollis, icon, karsten, mefoster, yeti
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	7.2.315-1.fc11	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-12-02 17:28:29 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Pete Zaitcev 2009-07-08 16:21:39 UTC

Description of problem:

The gvim prints the following to the terminal:
** (gvim:6411): CRITICAL **: gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed
This interferes with the normal use of terminal.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

vim-X11-7.2.148-1.fc11.x86_64

How reproducible:

Synchronous

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run gvim
  
Actual results:

Spew

Expected results:

Silence

Additional info:

It is common for GTK people to turn warnings on and off, but this seems
more interesting than the usual ones, so the bug.

The editor seems to work ok despite the message.

Comment 1 Pete Zaitcev 2009-08-01 01:55:02 UTC

Aww, man. This is annoying:
 http://ftp.moblin.org/moblin/releases/test/alpha1/doc/gdk/gdk-Windows.html#gdk-window-set-static-gravities
The doc suggests that our X11 server may not support StaticGravity period.
I have no clue what that means for the child windows.

Comment 2 Pete Zaitcev 2009-08-04 23:38:07 UTC

Kasten, can we just have this assertion commented out? It's not like
its result affects anything. This printout is very annoying.

Comment 3 James Vega 2009-10-14 19:35:51 UTC

That's essentially what upstream patch 7.2.257 does.
http://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.2/7.2.257

Comment 4 Bug Zapper 2009-11-16 10:45:14 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 12 development cycle.
Changing version to '12'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 5 Hollis Blanchard 2009-11-25 01:43:42 UTC

Bug is still present, and it looks like an easy fix (already committed upstream). Can we get an update for F12?

Comment 6 Karsten Hopp 2009-12-02 17:28:29 UTC

I'm preparing an update with this fix.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 14:29:05 UTC

vim-7.2.315-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-7.2.315-1.fc12

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 14:29:44 UTC

vim-7.2.315-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-7.2.315-1.fc11

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 14:30:22 UTC

vim-7.2.315-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-7.2.315-1.fc10

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 04:43:16 UTC

vim-7.2.315-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 04:59:00 UTC

vim-7.2.315-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.