Bug 511496

Summary: FTBFS 389-dsgw-1.1.3-1.fc12
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: FTBFS <ftbfs>
Component: 389-dsgwAssignee: Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: matt_domsch, nhosoi, nkinder, rmeggins, xjakub
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: screened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-07-17 16:16:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 511348    
Attachments:
Description Flags
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log none

Description FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:07:03 UTC
389-dsgw-1.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.

Comment 1 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:07:06 UTC
Setting to ASSIGNED per Fedora Bug Triage workflow.  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow

Comment 2 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:07:09 UTC
Created attachment 352139 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64

Comment 3 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:07:10 UTC
Created attachment 352140 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64

Comment 4 FTBFS 2009-07-15 03:07:11 UTC
Created attachment 352141 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64

Comment 5 Rich Megginson 2009-07-15 14:32:29 UTC
This looks like some sort of transient failure, not related to the package:
Error Downloading Packages:
  gcc-4.4.0-12.x86_64: failure: Packages/gcc-4.4.0-12.x86_64.rpm from fedora: (256, 'No more mirrors to try.')

What should I do with this bug?  Mark it as CLOSED/TRYAGAIN later?

Comment 6 Matt Domsch 2009-07-15 14:49:05 UTC
I'm rebuilding all the failed packages; transient build failures will get flagged as no longer failing, and I'll close those bugs later today.

Comment 7 Matt Domsch 2009-07-17 16:16:50 UTC
This was a build system failure, not a package bug.  I apologize.

Comment 8 Milos Jakubicek 2009-10-25 20:37:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> This was a build system failure, not a package bug.  I apologize.  

Matt, I just rebuilt this one -- we probably shouldn't close FTBFS bugreports until there is the build indeed present, otherwise we loose the ability to track them (IMO it's not important whether it is a package bug or a build system failure, we need to know and rebuild) :( I have actually some more thoughts about FTBFS bugs in relation with the mass rebuilds, I'll send them to you (and others) later.