Bug 516563

Summary:	Cannot install anthy-9100h-5 update (FEDORA-2009-7675) due to multilib
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	John Thacker <johnthacker>
Component:	anthy	Assignee:	Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	11	CC:	i18n-bugs, petersen, tagoh
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	9100h-7.fc11	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-08-20 20:53:01 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description John Thacker 2009-08-10 13:48:23 UTC

Description of problem:
The anthy-9100h-5.fc11 update release (FEDORA-2009-7675) does not install on x86_64.  The i586 and x86_64 packages conflict by having different dictionary files /usr/share/anthy/anthy.dic

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anthy-9100h-5.fc11

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum update anthy on a x86_64 machine
  
Actual results:
File downloads, rpm attempts install, and then
Transaction Check Error:
  file /usr/share/anthy/anthy.dic conflicts between attempted installs of
anthy-9100h-5.fc11.x86_64 and anthy-9100h-5.fc11.i586

Expected results:
anthy update should install.

Additional info:
Diff'ing the build logs (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/anthy/9100h/5.fc11/data/logs/x86_64/ and http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/anthy/9100h/5.fc11/data/logs/i586/) makes it clear that different dictionary files were generated.  The dictionary files are generated during compilation.

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2009-08-11 04:55:22 UTC

Out of curiousity why do you need anthy to be multilib?

Comment 2 John Thacker 2009-08-12 03:58:39 UTC

I don't think I need it to be, or that anyone else particularly does.  But if so, why is the i586 package in the x86_64 repository?  That's not the case for most packages that don't need to be multilib.

The i586 package was installed by default along with the x86_64 package when F11 was installed.

Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2009-08-20 09:39:50 UTC

Fixed in anthy-9100h-7.fc{10,11,12}.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 09:41:24 UTC

anthy-9100h-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anthy-9100h-7.fc11

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 09:42:12 UTC

anthy-9100h-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anthy-9100h-7.fc10

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 20:52:56 UTC

anthy-9100h-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 21:03:36 UTC

anthy-9100h-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.