Bug 516793
| Summary: | Need to package FCKeditor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Documentation | Reporter: | eric |
| Component: | project-tracking | Assignee: | Fedora Documentation Project <docs> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | devel | CC: | kwade, loadgold, mel, stickster |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-07-07 18:18:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 504066 | ||
|
Description
eric
2009-08-11 14:41:07 UTC
Would anyone like to take one of these for action? I know we have an editor that is being worked at this time. Do we still need either of these packaged? Your comment seens like dis offical 0f redhat . If not AD. (In reply to comment #2) > Your comment seens like dis offical 0f redhat . > If not AD. Huh? Mel, Karsten -- is this editor package still needed for Zikula, or do we have an appropriate editor that satisfies our needs for now? |