Bug 516794
| Summary: | Need to package OpenWYSIWYG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Fedora Documentation | Reporter: | eric |
| Component: | project-tracking | Assignee: | Fedora Documentation Project <docs> |
| Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | devel | CC: | kwade, loadgold, mel, stickster |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-07-07 18:19:55 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 504066 | ||
|
Description
eric
2009-08-11 14:42:29 UTC
Would anyone like to take one of these for action? I know we have an editor that is being worked at this time. Do we still need either of these packaged? Your comment seens like dis offical 0f redhat. If not AD. (In reply to comment #2) > Your comment seens like dis offical 0f redhat. > If not AD. Huh? Mel, Karsten -- do we still need a WYSIWYG editor for Zikula, or do we have an appropriate one that is already in use? (I thought it was the latter case.) |