Bug 517980

Summary: RFE: include brand with Creative Commons license
Product: [Community] Publican Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: publicanAssignee: Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.6CC: jfearn, mmcallis, publican-list
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.0 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-24 04:18:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexander Todorov 2009-08-18 09:22:19 UTC 
Description of problem:
Documentation at:
http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Publican-Branding.html

says:
To make a custom brand, use the brand with the license you wish to use as base for your new brand. If you want to use a different open source license, and none of the shipped brands are compatible with your license, submit a bug using Red Hat Bugzilla against the product fedora, component publican, and ask for a new brand to be shipped under that license. 

This also lists the JBoss brand under CC-BY-NC-SA but this is not true. The JBoss brand is under Open Publication License already. 

Please include a brand that is licensed under Creative Commons license. If possible do not add any restrictions to the CC license.
Comment 1 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2009-08-24 04:18:11 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> Documentation at:
> http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Publican-Branding.html
> 
> says:
> To make a custom brand, use the brand with the license you wish to use as base
> for your new brand. If you want to use a different open source license, and
> none of the shipped brands are compatible with your license, submit a bug using
> Red Hat Bugzilla against the product fedora, component publican, and ask for a
> new brand to be shipped under that license. 

This is for 0.4x publican, the new version does it differently.

> This also lists the JBoss brand under CC-BY-NC-SA but this is not true. The
> JBoss brand is under Open Publication License already. 

The JBoss brand was OPL but changed to CC-BY-NC-SA.

> Please include a brand that is licensed under Creative Commons license. If
> possible do not add any restrictions to the CC license.  

The beta contains a coded solution to produce unlicensed brands, allowing the creator to license a brand how they see fit.

The brands produced this way don't install properly for the beta, but will work once the new version goes live.