Description of problem: Documentation at: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Publican-Branding.html says: To make a custom brand, use the brand with the license you wish to use as base for your new brand. If you want to use a different open source license, and none of the shipped brands are compatible with your license, submit a bug using Red Hat Bugzilla against the product fedora, component publican, and ask for a new brand to be shipped under that license. This also lists the JBoss brand under CC-BY-NC-SA but this is not true. The JBoss brand is under Open Publication License already. Please include a brand that is licensed under Creative Commons license. If possible do not add any restrictions to the CC license.
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > Documentation at: > http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/Publican/chap-Publican-Branding.html > > says: > To make a custom brand, use the brand with the license you wish to use as base > for your new brand. If you want to use a different open source license, and > none of the shipped brands are compatible with your license, submit a bug using > Red Hat Bugzilla against the product fedora, component publican, and ask for a > new brand to be shipped under that license. This is for 0.4x publican, the new version does it differently. > This also lists the JBoss brand under CC-BY-NC-SA but this is not true. The > JBoss brand is under Open Publication License already. The JBoss brand was OPL but changed to CC-BY-NC-SA. > Please include a brand that is licensed under Creative Commons license. If > possible do not add any restrictions to the CC license. The beta contains a coded solution to produce unlicensed brands, allowing the creator to license a brand how they see fit. The brands produced this way don't install properly for the beta, but will work once the new version goes live.