Bug 518489
| Summary: | Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | akurtako:
fedora-review+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-08-20 17:19:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Andrew Overholt
2009-08-20 15:28:42 UTC
Formal review:
OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Rpmlint gives the following warnings:
plexus-containers.noarch: W: no-documentation
plexus-containers.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-containers
plexus-containers-component-annotations.noarch: W: no-documentation
plexus-containers-container-default.noarch: W: no-documentation
It would be good if we can fix them but it's not a blocker.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: Instructions for fetching
OK: The package MUST successfully compile
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates.
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly.
OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15]
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application.
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26]
This package is APPROVED.
|