Bug 518489 - Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus
Summary: Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Alexander Kurtakov
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2009-08-20 15:28 UTC by Andrew Overholt
Modified: 2009-08-20 17:19 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-08-20 17:19:41 UTC
akurtako: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 15:28:42 UTC
Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-containers.spec
SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-containers-1.0-0.1.a34.7.fc11.src.rpm

Description: 
The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for
writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be
embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many
reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n,
velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which
is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage.

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 16:46:57 UTC
Formal review:

OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Rpmlint gives the following warnings:
plexus-containers.noarch: W: no-documentation
plexus-containers.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-containers
plexus-containers-component-annotations.noarch: W: no-documentation
plexus-containers-container-default.noarch: W: no-documentation

It would be good if we can fix them but it's not a blocker.

OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
OK: Instructions for fetching
OK: The package MUST successfully compile 
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15]
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. 
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26]

This package is APPROVED.

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 17:19:41 UTC
Built:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618018


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.