Bug 535222 (RHQ-1941)
| Summary: | Timeslices not perfectly proportional across very long time ranges. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Other] RHQ Project | Reporter: | Corey Welton <cwelton> |
| Component: | Core UI | Assignee: | RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Mike Foley <mfoley> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 1.2 | CC: | jshaughn |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | SubBug |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-1941 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2014-05-02 17:50:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 565628, 678340 | ||
This bug was previously known as http://jira.rhq-project.org/browse/RHQ-1941 Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs. keyword: new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage |
1. Assure you've got a platform in inventory that has been inventoried/actively monitored for a few days. 2. Somewhere along the line -- maybe shortly after inventorying the platform -- go to Monitor > Graphs for this platform and change "Metric Display Range: Last :" to 120 Days 3. After you've got a few days of data, return to Monitor > Graphs 4. You should see a bunch of gray dots for those dates where the platform had not been monitored. Hover over most of these, note the date and time 5. Scan over to the last 3-4 dots that are red/green according to the collected data. Current results: The gray dots show a time that is equivalent to (current time - n(days)). The red/green dots show different times. Expected results: Proportional/consistent timeslices. Other notes: Oddly, the first time I did this, all but the second to last dot showed the correct time. When I changed the time range, and then returned it to 120 days, none of the days for which data was collected show the correct time. [22:16] <joseph> yeah, the red one seems to be off [22:16] <joseph> the correct logic would probably be to show timestamps as perfect dissections of the total display rnage