Bug 536689
Summary: | libnetfilter_conntrack update (0.0.100) for fc11 conflicts with iptstate dependencies | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Philip Prindeville <philipp> |
Component: | libnetfilter_conntrack | Assignee: | Paul P Komkoff Jr <i> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 11 | CC: | andrew, chenhuan.gt, chris.gresty, cross, djuran, flint42, gwync, i, jdy, j.golderer, joe, jonrysh, mitchb, pahan, phil, robatino, ronin3510, rtc, sergei.litvinenko, sjensen, twoerner, unidevar, vr5 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 2.2.2-3.fc10 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-11-12 00:50:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Philip Prindeville
2009-11-10 23:23:32 UTC
F11 x86 too Also breaks iptstate on Fedora 10 *** Bug 536695 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I broke it, I gonna fix it... iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc10 iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc11 *** Bug 536744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Also note that you can push multiple packages within a single ticket in bodhi. *** Bug 536790 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. *** Bug 536904 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I just upgraded to F12 and it has the same problem: Error: Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 is needed by package iptstate-2.2.1-6.fc12.i686 (fedora) even happens with --enablerepo=updates-testing The problem's fixed in F10 and F11. It looks like iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc12 was built in Koji beyond the point where it automatically got into F12, and Thomas needs to submit an update request to push it out. (In reply to comment #14) > The problem's fixed in F10 and F11. It looks like iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc12 > was built in Koji beyond the point where it automatically got into F12, > and Thomas needs to submit an update request to push it out. Nope, the most recent F12 build is still has the problem (F10 and F11 ones are okay): rpm -qp --requires http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/iptstate/2.2.2/3.fc10/i386/iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc10.i386.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/iptstate/2.2.2/3.fc11/i586/iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc11.i586.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/iptstate/2.2.2/3.fc12/i686/iptstate-2.2.2-3.fc12.i686.rpm | grep libnetfilter libnetfilter_conntrack.so.3 libnetfilter_conntrack.so.3 libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1 <----- Oh, I see. The original libnetfilter_conntrack update *also* happened after the point where things built in Rawhide no longer automatically became tagged into F12. So, your F11 machine had libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.100-1.fc11, and it's trying to update to libnetfilter_conntrack-0.0.99-3.fc12, because 0.0.100-1 doesn't exist in the F12 repo. In fact, if you look in Koji, you'll find that libnetfilter_conntrack 0.0.100-1 was never even built for F12, let alone submitted as an update. So, the new libnetfilter_conntrack needs to be built and pushed to F12, and then iptstate needs to be rebuilt against it in F12 and pushed out. I'll fix it today. For now you can ignore iptstate update f11->f12, I guess Is this going to be rebuilt for f12 any time soon? Nothing since the 11th!: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=702 Yes it will. I am waiting for fedora releng to manually create a dist-override for me https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3163 |