Bug 544581

Just one small comment:

URL and Source0 points to the same location.  Seams to be a copy-&-paste error.

(In reply to comment #1)
> URL and Source0 points to the same location.  Seams to be a copy-&-paste error.  

Oh, yes, thanks.
Corrected.
URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/MiniMock



Also updated to latest version.



rpmlint still clean.




Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-minimock.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm

Package Review
==============

Package: 

Key:
 - = N/A
 x = Check
 ! = Problem
 ? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
 [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
 [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec
 [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
 [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one
supported architecture
     Tested on: F12/i386
 [x] Rpmlint output:
     Source RPM:
     [fab@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm 
     1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
     Binary RPM(s):
     [fab@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 
     1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 [x] Package is not relocatable
 [x] Buildroot is correct
     master   : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
     spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
 [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
     License type: MIT
 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc

 [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English
 [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL
     Upstream source: 404ad9b0b2052686dee28936403aa3e7
     Build source:    404ad9b0b2052686dee28936403aa3e7
 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
 [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
 [-] The spec file handles locales properly.  %find_lang used for locales
 [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured
 [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required
 [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 [x] Package must own all directories that it creates
 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses
 [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages
 [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files
 [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section
 [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime
 [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 [-] Included tests passed successfully 
 [x] Package consistently uses macros
 [x] Package contains code, or permissable content
 [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8

 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required
 [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present
 [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present
 [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present
 [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present
 [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present
 [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
 [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete
 [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
 
 [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application
 [-] Follows desktop entry spec
 [-] Valid .desktop Name
 [-] Valid .desktop GenericName
 [-] Valid .desktop Categories
 [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
 [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
 [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install
 [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
 [x] Latest version is packaged
 [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream
 [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available
 [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock
     Tested on: F12/i386
 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported
architectures.
     Tested:  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888127
 [?] Package functions as described
 [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used
 [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct
 [-] File based requires are sane
 [x] Changelog in allowed format

I see no further blocker, package APPROVED

Thanks for reviewing this.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name:      python-minimock
Short Description: The simplest possible mock library
Owners:            tomspur
Branches: 
InitialCC:

CVS Done

Oh no,... forgot to add the branches :'(
Sorry, Dennis.


Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: python-minimock
New Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5
Owners: tomspur

cvs done.

python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc11

python-minimock-1.2.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.el5

python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12

python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

python-minimock-1.2.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.