Bug 546353

Summary: [abrt] crash detected in compiz-0.8.2-21.fc13
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Bernie Innocenti <bernie+fedora>
Component: libcompizconfigAssignee: Izhar Firdaus <kagesenshi.87>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: adel.gadllah, campbecg, kagesenshi.87, leigh123linux
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:3ee1276f2520ceb4bc7df857de562877edf4d8ce
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-12-22 05:47:23 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description Bernie Innocenti 2009-12-10 12:41:33 EST
abrt 1.0.0 detected a crash.

How to reproduce
-----
1.open ccsm
2.export a profile to a file
3.load back the same profile


Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: compiz --ignore-desktop-hints glib gconf gnomecompat --replace
component: compiz
executable: /usr/bin/compiz
kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64
package: compiz-0.8.2-21.fc13
rating: 3
reason: Process was terminated by signal 11
Comment 1 Bernie Innocenti 2009-12-10 12:41:35 EST
Created attachment 377536 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 leigh scott 2009-12-21 14:49:28 EST
I am unable to replicate the bug on my 64 bit Rawhide install using your steps to reproduce.
Also your backtrace is incomplete as you haven't got all the debug packages installed.
Comment 3 Chris Campbell 2009-12-21 16:19:58 EST
This bug has been triaged

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 4 leigh scott 2009-12-21 16:30:54 EST
Can you explain your comment ? 

(In reply to comment #3)
> This bug has been triaged
> 
> -- 
> Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Comment 5 Matěj Cepl 2009-12-21 20:15:07 EST
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can you explain your comment ? 

> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers  

Basically what that means is that a volunteer bug triager took a look at the bug and considered it sufficiently complete, so that it could be looked at by developers without an undue risk of their wasting their time on trivialities.
Comment 6 leigh scott 2009-12-22 05:47:23 EST
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Can you explain your comment ? 
> 
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers  
> 
> Basically what that means is that a volunteer bug triager took a look at the
> bug and considered it sufficiently complete, so that it could be looked at by
> developers without an undue risk of their wasting their time on trivialities.  


Thanks for the explanation.
Looking at the bug I believe the best resolution at this time is to close it as  'works for me'.
I believe Drago01 will bump compiz to version 0.8.4 for F13 which would make fixing this redundant.