Bug 549229

Summary: Please update clutter to latest version in rawhide
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Hicham HAOUARI <hicham.haouari>
Component: clutterAssignee: Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: allisson, bnocera, itamar, mclasen, otaylor, pbrobinson, sundaram
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-04 02:10:43 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 552575    
Bug Blocks: 549228    

Description Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-21 01:06:47 UTC
Description of problem:
Clutter's latest version (1.1.2) is not yet available in rawhide

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
no build in rawhide yet


Additional info:
I need that version and up to build fosfor : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228

Comment 1 Hicham HAOUARI 2010-01-06 12:40:15 UTC
repoquery --all --whatrequires clutter

clutter-sharp-0:0-0.6.20090828.fc12.i686
clutter-doc-0:1.0.6-1.fc12.i686
clutter-devel-0:1.0.6-1.fc12.i686


The only package that could be affected is clutter-sharp, but then again :
repoquery --all --whatrequires clutter-sharp

clutter-sharp-devel-0:0-0.6.20090828.fc12.i686


So I don't think that updating to 1.1 stable version can do any harm

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 12:41:37 UTC
I looked at this yesterday. There's issues with gtk-doc in rawhide. I filed bug 552575 about it. It can be worked around by removing gtkdoc-fixxref from the makefile but I think a proper fix should be done. clutter should move to the development 1.1.4 release in rawhide anyway, but that also has this issue.

Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2010-01-06 12:44:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> repoquery --all --whatrequires clutter
> 
> clutter-sharp-0:0-0.6.20090828.fc12.i686
> clutter-doc-0:1.0.6-1.fc12.i686
> clutter-devel-0:1.0.6-1.fc12.i686
> 
> 
> The only package that could be affected is clutter-sharp, but then again :
> repoquery --all --whatrequires clutter-sharp
> 
> clutter-sharp-devel-0:0-0.6.20090828.fc12.i686
> 
> 
> So I don't think that updating to 1.1 stable version can do any harm  

That query is wrong. There is at least mutter, nbtk and a good half dozen Moblin packages that depend on clutter. That said I don't believe that clutter 1.1.x breaks the 1.x api but rather just extends it. I'm not sure if there's a soname bump though which would require a recompile of everything which needs to be coordinated.

Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2010-01-07 00:13:50 UTC
clutter 1.0.8 built fine with the gtk-doc fix. I'll look at the impact of 1.1 tomorrow.

Comment 5 Peter Robinson 2010-01-07 00:28:25 UTC
Having just spoken to the mutter and gnome-shell maintainers clutter 1.1 currently badly breaks both mutter and by definition gnome-shell and moblin. This is planned to be fixed shortly but for the moment we need to stick with 1.0.x

Comment 6 Peter Robinson 2010-02-03 11:38:44 UTC
This is now just pending the fix of this bug upstream which will allow us to upgrade to git master of mutter.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607125

Comment 7 Peter Robinson 2010-02-04 02:10:43 UTC
clutter 1.1.6 is on its way to rawhide.