Bug 554471

Summary:	Should ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bruno Wolff III <bruno>
Component:	ibus-table	Assignee:	Caius Chance <K9>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	i18n-bugs, K9, phuang
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	i18n
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-01-14 01:46:32 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bruno Wolff III 2010-01-11 19:47:00 UTC

Description of problem:
The ibus-table-additional package has been dropped from rawhide, but because it depends on ibus-table, upgrades of ibus-table were blocked pending manually removing ibus-table-additional.
Even if the new ibus-table doesn't actually provide the feature that was formerly supplied by ibus-table-additional it still might make sense to have ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional so that yum upgrades work smoothly.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-table-1.2.0.20100111-1.fc13.noarch
ibus-table-additional-1.2.0.20090912-3.fc13.noarch
ibus-table-1.2.0.20090912-3.fc13.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Caius Chance 2010-01-14 01:37:05 UTC

yes it should

also, ibus-table-latin and ibus-table-code should be obsoleting ibus-table-additional instead (they are still in package review progress)

we should temp obsoletes by ibus-table and tables in -additional are provided by ibus-table until ibus-table-{latin,code} are ready in rawhide repo

Comment 2 Caius Chance 2010-01-14 01:46:32 UTC

fixed in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1920208