Bug 554471 - Should ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional?
Summary: Should ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional?
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: ibus-table
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caius Chance
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-11 19:47 UTC by Bruno Wolff III
Modified: 2010-01-14 01:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-14 01:46:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bruno Wolff III 2010-01-11 19:47:00 UTC
Description of problem:
The ibus-table-additional package has been dropped from rawhide, but because it depends on ibus-table, upgrades of ibus-table were blocked pending manually removing ibus-table-additional.
Even if the new ibus-table doesn't actually provide the feature that was formerly supplied by ibus-table-additional it still might make sense to have ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional so that yum upgrades work smoothly.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-table-1.2.0.20100111-1.fc13.noarch
ibus-table-additional-1.2.0.20090912-3.fc13.noarch
ibus-table-1.2.0.20090912-3.fc13.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Caius Chance 2010-01-14 01:37:05 UTC
yes it should

also, ibus-table-latin and ibus-table-code should be obsoleting ibus-table-additional instead (they are still in package review progress)

we should temp obsoletes by ibus-table and tables in -additional are provided by ibus-table until ibus-table-{latin,code} are ready in rawhide repo

Comment 2 Caius Chance 2010-01-14 01:46:32 UTC
fixed in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1920208


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.