Bug 555092

Summary:	Review Request: remotefs - fuse based network file system
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jean-Jacques Sarton <jj.sarton>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, mrunge, notting, opensource, pahan, tomspur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	NotReady
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2012-01-14 09:25:08 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jean-Jacques Sarton 2010-01-13 16:25:17 UTC

Spec URL: http://remotefs.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/remotefs/trunk/build/redhat/
SRPM URL: 
Description: Network file system designed for use with home NAS. Simple to use, few dependencies, reasonable security, completely in user space.


Review Request, FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2010-01-13 19:13:05 UTC

What is this review about?

The client, the server, the nss module?

You need to file one review request per programm, you want to package...

Comment 2 Till Maas 2010-01-14 13:58:01 UTC

Please read the packaging guidelines and use them to create your spec:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

At first sight I already noticed that the License tag is not valid for Fedora and the Source-tag does not use a URL. Please also provide links to a SRPM and it is also better to provide a direct link to the SPEC.

Please also make yourself familiar with the review process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

You should review other packages to show, that you understood the Fedora packaging guidelines. Then someone will sponsor you.

If you have any more questions, please ask.
Once you have adapted the SPEC-file more to the Fedora packaging guidelines, please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard.

Comment 3 Matthias Runge 2011-09-01 12:56:28 UTC

Any progress here?