Bug 555092 - Review Request: remotefs - fuse based network file system
Summary: Review Request: remotefs - fuse based network file system
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: NotReady
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-01-13 16:25 UTC by Jean-Jacques Sarton
Modified: 2013-10-19 14:42 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-01-14 09:25:08 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jean-Jacques Sarton 2010-01-13 16:25:17 UTC
Spec URL: http://remotefs.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/remotefs/trunk/build/redhat/
SRPM URL: 
Description: Network file system designed for use with home NAS. Simple to use, few dependencies, reasonable security, completely in user space.


Review Request, FE-NEEDSPONSOR

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2010-01-13 19:13:05 UTC
What is this review about?

The client, the server, the nss module?

You need to file one review request per programm, you want to package...

Comment 2 Till Maas 2010-01-14 13:58:01 UTC
Please read the packaging guidelines and use them to create your spec:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

At first sight I already noticed that the License tag is not valid for Fedora and the Source-tag does not use a URL. Please also provide links to a SRPM and it is also better to provide a direct link to the SPEC.

Please also make yourself familiar with the review process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process

You should review other packages to show, that you understood the Fedora packaging guidelines. Then someone will sponsor you.

If you have any more questions, please ask.
Once you have adapted the SPEC-file more to the Fedora packaging guidelines, please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard.

Comment 3 Matthias Runge 2011-09-01 12:56:28 UTC
Any progress here?


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.