Bug 55825

Summary: /usr/share/libtool/ltconfig disappeared?
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Need Real Name <ted>
Component: libtoolAssignee: Jens Petersen <petersen>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Aaron Brown <abrown>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.2CC: bugs.michael
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-11-09 12:58:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Need Real Name 2001-11-07 10:00:34 UTC
Description of Problem:

/usr/share/libtool/ltconfig present in RedHat7.1
/usr/share/libtool/ltconfig vanished in RedHat 7.2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
 
RedHat7.1: 
[ted@lorient ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/libtool/ltconfig
libtool-1.3.5-8

How Reproducible:

locate ltconfig
The file is not where it is supposed to be


Additional Information:
I wanted to rebuild scilab-2.6
rpm --rebuild scilab-2.6-1.src.rpm
It does not work because ltconfig is not there

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2001-11-07 17:55:01 UTC
ltconfig is gone with newer versions of libtool. Unless I'm mistaken,
applications should either include a copy of ltconfig (unfortunately, old
combinations of automake/libtool created just a link) or get fixed.

In the top source dir, run:

  alocal ; automake -a -c ; autoconf

This should solve your problems.

Comment 2 Need Real Name 2001-11-08 09:50:46 UTC
I tried what you said:

%prep
%setup -q 
%patch0 -p1
aclocal; automake -a -c; autoconf

%build
cp /usr/share/libtool/{config.sub,config.guess,ltconfig,ltmain.sh} config/
export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
export CC_OPTIONS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
...


but I obtain the following message error:
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.27849
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ cd /usr/src/redhat/BUILD
+ rm -rf scilab-2.6
+ /bin/gzip -dc /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/scilab-2.6.src.tar.gz
+ tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd scilab-2.6
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chown -Rhf root .
++ /usr/bin/id -u
+ '[' 0 = 0 ']'
+ /bin/chgrp -Rhf root .
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (scilab-2.6-nopvmdist.patch):'
Patch #0 (scilab-2.6-nopvmdist.patch):
+ patch -p1 -s
+ aclocal
+ automake -a -c
configure.in: 9: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER'
automake: configure.in: `PACKAGE' not defined in `configure.in'
automake: configure.in: `VERSION' not defined in `configure.in'
automake: configure.in: installing `config/mkinstalldirs'
automake: configure.in: installing `config/missing'
automake: no `Makefile.am' found or specified
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.27849 (%prep)


What have I done wrong?

Daniel

Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2001-11-08 16:34:28 UTC
It doesn't use automake. :)

With

  libtoolize -c --force ; configure ...

one can set up the source tarball and compile with "make all". In your spec
file, you may need to take out the first "cp" line from the %build section and
most likely any "aclocal" and "autoconf" calls, too. The scilab distribution is
broken  when it doesn't come with a working set of files and keeps local macros
in aclocal.m4 instead of acinclude.m4. It will need to get fixed, not only for
libtool > 1.3.5.


Comment 4 Need Real Name 2001-11-09 12:23:58 UTC
Thanks for your answer
If I understand correctly what you wrote, Scilab will have anyway problems to
build on RH72? Is that it?
Maybe I should wait for the RH SRPMS...

Daniel

Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2001-11-09 12:58:49 UTC
The way the rpm's spec file sets up the code is incompatible.

Basically, you should need to run just "configure ; make all" like the README
suggests. You should not need to copy over libtool files from your installation
like the spec file does. If you really needed to rebuild
autoconf/automake/libtool files, this would not work completely with scilab
because their setup is broken.

I'm not a Red Hat employee, but since the Powertools CD is no longer produced,
there probably won't be any offically supported RH rpms for scilab.