Bug 558569

Summary:	the Samba Share "Resource Name:" parameter not being used anywhere
Product:	[Other] RHQ Project	Reporter:	John Sefler <jsefler>
Component:	Configuration	Assignee:	RHQ Project Maintainer <rhq-maint>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	1.4	CC:	cwelton, jshaughn
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	SubBug
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-05-23 21:01:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	545537

Description John Sefler 2010-01-25 17:29:14 UTC

Description of problem:
When creating a Samba Share child resource within the iManage UI, there are two paramters whose usage is confusing:
1. Resource Name:
2. Name

The "Name" parameter is used to actually name the share.  It gets written to the smb.conf file as the share name.  It is used as the Resource Key for the child resource.  And it is appended by the string " share" to identify the share as a child resource of the Samba Server.

So the problem is:
Where does the "Resource Name:" value get used?  It looks like nowhere.

Expected results:
Personally I believe the intended design was for the "Resource Name:" value was to be used to name the child resource in the UI.  Therefore the hard-coded appending of " share" to the Name value is a bug.  The samba shares (child resources) of a samba server should be presented in the UI by the "Resource Name:" values entered at creation time.

Comment 1 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:53:58 UTC

Temporarily adding the keyword "SubBug" so we can be sure we have accounted for all the bugs.

keyword:
new = Tracking + FutureFeature + SubBug

Comment 2 wes hayutin 2010-02-16 16:59:16 UTC

making sure we're not missing any bugs in rhq_triage

Comment 3 Corey Welton 2010-09-30 14:09:12 UTC

lowering severity/priority - not an enterprise plugin