| Summary: | vim doesn't handle tags produced by ctags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Veillard, Daniel <daniel.veillard> |
| Component: | ctags | Assignee: | Preston Brown <pbrown> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 6.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2000-02-10 20:46:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | ||
|
Description
Veillard, Daniel
1999-10-05 22:43:54 UTC
I had no problem using the regular 'tags' file produced by ctags with vim. However, the TAGS file produced for emacs via the '-e' option worked as well. This is ctags 3.2, included in 6.0 and later. I have the same trouble. I'm on RH 6.1 with vim 5.4 and ctags-3.2-1. The problem goes away when I do: :set notagbsearch or when I generate the tags file outside of vim with the -e option. Since other bug reports seem to indicate that sort has changed recently to be POSIX compliant, perhaps vim expects the sorting one way while the new `sort' sorts another? The question then would be: Can I configure vim to call `sort' with the right backwards compatible options? |