Bug 561430

Summary: Review Request: geronimo-jta - J2EE JTA v1.1 API
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mary Ellen Foster <mefoster>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: akurtako, fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: akurtako: fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-23 11:46:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mary Ellen Foster 2010-02-03 16:22:55 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/geronimo/geronimo-jta.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/geronimo/geronimo-jta-1.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: This package splits just the jta-1.1 components of the giant
monolithic geronimo-specs spec. Requires geronimo-parent-poms.

Comment 1 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-02-10 13:39:35 UTC
I'm taking this one.

Comment 2 Mary Ellen Foster 2010-02-10 15:53:46 UTC
Updated version with better descriptions and cleaned-up Provides and Obsoletes:


Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/geronimo/geronimo-jta.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/geronimo/geronimo-jta-1.1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm

Comment 3 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-02-10 17:26:20 UTC
Review:
NOTOK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Warnings:
geronimo-jta.src:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes geronimo-specs
geronimo-jta.spec:27: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes geronimo-specs
Should be fixed. Please put a version for the obsoletes

geronimo-jta.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided geronimo-specs
geronimo-jta.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/geronimo-jta
Both are not a problem as we really want to obsolete and the second one is just
how maven works.
OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
OK: The spec file must be written in American English. 
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Fetch instructions provided.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. 
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} 
OK: Each package must consistently use macros. 
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. 
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. 
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. 
OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

Please fix the unversioned obsolete and the package is good.

Comment 5 Alexander Kurtakov 2010-02-10 17:34:11 UTC
Package is APPROVED.

Comment 6 Mary Ellen Foster 2010-02-11 09:54:24 UTC
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: geronimo-jta
Short Description: J2EE JTA v1.1 API
Owners: mef
Branches: F-12

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2010-02-13 04:20:22 UTC
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).