Bug 561473

Summary:	Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Mo Morsi <mmorsi>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, notting, tomspur
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-02-04 13:28:30 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	561464
Bug Blocks:

Description Mo Morsi 2010-02-03 18:14:46 UTC

Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/bytelist.spec
SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/bytelist-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: 
A small java library for manipulating lists of bytes

Unorphaning package: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bytelist

Required by JRuby.

No koji build yet as bytelist depends on jcodings which it pending Fedora approval itself.

$  rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/bytelist-1.0.3-1.fc12.i386.rpm 
bytelist.i386: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Ignoring as source package does not provide documentation.

$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/bytelist-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm 
bytelist.src:83: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Ignoring this last warning as when package is noarch (eg if using java-openjdk)
the libdir file will not be included, and when the package is architecture
specific (eg when using gcj) it will be. See spec file for conditionals.

Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2010-02-04 13:28:30 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 560169 ***