Bug 561473 - Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes
Review Request: bytelist - A java library for lists of bytes
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 560169
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On: 561464
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-02-03 13:14 EST by Mo Morsi
Modified: 2010-02-04 08:34 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-02-04 08:28:30 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Mo Morsi 2010-02-03 13:14:46 EST
Spec URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/bytelist.spec
SRPM URL: http://mo.morsi.org/files/jruby/bytelist-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description: 
A small java library for manipulating lists of bytes

Unorphaning package: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bytelist

Required by JRuby.

No koji build yet as bytelist depends on jcodings which it pending Fedora approval itself.

$  rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/bytelist-1.0.3-1.fc12.i386.rpm 
bytelist.i386: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Ignoring as source package does not provide documentation.

$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/bytelist-1.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm 
bytelist.src:83: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Ignoring this last warning as when package is noarch (eg if using java-openjdk)
the libdir file will not be included, and when the package is architecture
specific (eg when using gcj) it will be. See spec file for conditionals.
Comment 1 Thomas Spura 2010-02-04 08:28:30 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 560169 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.