Bug 563176
| Summary: | Review Request: buildsys-macros - buildsys macros needed to build EPEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Till Maas <opensource> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, opensource, rdieter, steve.traylen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-11-24 22:56:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Till Maas
2010-02-09 12:53:13 UTC
This looks to be the wrong format. error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/buildsys-macros.spec;4b8e3c9c: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch Can you resupply with by building with rpmbuild-md5 Steve (In reply to comment #1) > This looks to be the wrong format. > > error: unpacking of archive failed on file > /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/buildsys-macros.spec;4b8e3c9c: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch > > Can you resupply with by building with rpmbuild-md5 Done. Thx for introducing me to rpmbuild-md5. I just replaced the old src.rpm, since there were not other changes: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/buildsys-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/buildsys-macros-5-6.el5.src.rpm After trying to find someone involved with EPEL to review this, I got this on IRC: [12:41] <abadger1999> dgilmore: is buildsys-macros something that you don't want in the repo? [12:42] <dgilmore> abadger1999: id prefer it not be [12:42] <abadger1999> dgilmore: okay. what's the reasoning? [12:44] <dgilmore> its a hack and not a real fix So, I think this probably shouldn't be reviewed at this point until that issue is worked out. (In reply to comment #3) > [12:44] <dgilmore> its a hack and not a real fix > > So, I think this probably shouldn't be reviewed at this point until that issue > is worked out. I can now safely assume that this will never work out after years of waiting and several attempts to get something. Since CentOS 6 will hopefully be available soon allowing me to stop contributing to EPEL 5 I capitulate. |