Bug 563399

Summary:	abyssinica-fonts should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jens Petersen <petersen>
Component:	abyssinica-fonts	Assignee:	Mathieu Bridon <mathieu>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fonts-bugs, johnp, mathieu
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-02-13 08:34:37 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	563673
Bug Blocks:

Description Jens Petersen 2010-02-10 05:05:11 UTC

Description of problem:
I *think* should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts in line
with the Fedora Fonts SIG naming conventions and other SIL fonts.

Steps to Reproduce:
$ repoquery -qa sil-*fonts
sil-charis-fonts-0:4.106-3.fc12.noarch
sil-gentium-basic-fonts-0:1.1-5.fc12.noarch
sil-gentium-fonts-0:1.02-10.fc12.noarch
sil-lateef-fonts-0:1.001-1.fc12.noarch
sil-gentium-basic-book-fonts-0:1.1-5.fc12.noarch
sil-padauk-fonts-0:2.4-6.fc12.noarch
sil-doulos-fonts-0:4.104-5.fc12.noarch
sil-andika-fonts-0:1.0-7.fc12.noarch
sil-scheherazade-fonts-0:1.001-2.fc12.noarch
sil-charis-compact-fonts-0:4.106-2.fc12.noarch
sil-gentium-alt-fonts-0:1.02-10.fc12.noarch
$ repoquery -qa sil-*fonts| grep abyssinica
$ 
Actual results:
$ repoquery -qa sil-*fonts| grep abyssinica
$ 

Expected results:
$ repoquery -q sil-abyssinica-fonts
sil-abyssinica-fonts...
$

Comment 1 Nicolas Mailhot 2010-02-10 10:54:23 UTC

Sure it should. There was probably a "adapt to F11 packaging guidelines" bug open about it a year ago

Comment 2 Mathieu Bridon 2010-02-10 13:20:28 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> Sure it should. There was probably a "adapt to F11 packaging guidelines" bug
> open about it a year ago    

Here it is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477330

I took over the package from Bernie when the new packaging were being enforced, so the first thing I did was to check if there was such a bug opened.

I saw he had closed it and no one had complained, so I assumed it was done properly and I didn't care much about it. :)

Thanks for the report anyway, I'll try to fix this ASAP (probably this week-end)

Comment 3 Mathieu Bridon 2010-02-10 20:51:42 UTC

Just submitted the re-review request as bug 563673.

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2010-02-11 06:16:39 UTC

Thanks for the fast response :)

Comment 5 Mathieu Bridon 2010-02-13 08:34:37 UTC

Re-review was completed, package was imported to CVS and built for Rawhide.