Description of problem: I *think* should be renamed to sil-abyssinica-fonts in line with the Fedora Fonts SIG naming conventions and other SIL fonts. Steps to Reproduce: $ repoquery -qa sil-*fonts sil-charis-fonts-0:4.106-3.fc12.noarch sil-gentium-basic-fonts-0:1.1-5.fc12.noarch sil-gentium-fonts-0:1.02-10.fc12.noarch sil-lateef-fonts-0:1.001-1.fc12.noarch sil-gentium-basic-book-fonts-0:1.1-5.fc12.noarch sil-padauk-fonts-0:2.4-6.fc12.noarch sil-doulos-fonts-0:4.104-5.fc12.noarch sil-andika-fonts-0:1.0-7.fc12.noarch sil-scheherazade-fonts-0:1.001-2.fc12.noarch sil-charis-compact-fonts-0:4.106-2.fc12.noarch sil-gentium-alt-fonts-0:1.02-10.fc12.noarch $ repoquery -qa sil-*fonts| grep abyssinica $ Actual results: $ repoquery -qa sil-*fonts| grep abyssinica $ Expected results: $ repoquery -q sil-abyssinica-fonts sil-abyssinica-fonts... $
Sure it should. There was probably a "adapt to F11 packaging guidelines" bug open about it a year ago
(In reply to comment #1) > Sure it should. There was probably a "adapt to F11 packaging guidelines" bug > open about it a year ago Here it is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477330 I took over the package from Bernie when the new packaging were being enforced, so the first thing I did was to check if there was such a bug opened. I saw he had closed it and no one had complained, so I assumed it was done properly and I didn't care much about it. :) Thanks for the report anyway, I'll try to fix this ASAP (probably this week-end)
Just submitted the re-review request as bug 563673.
Thanks for the fast response :)
Re-review was completed, package was imported to CVS and built for Rawhide.