Bug 564462

Summary:	cloning sparsed image guests with virt-manager produces preallocated guest image
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Joachim Schröder <jschrode>
Component:	libvirt	Assignee:	Daniel Veillard <veillard>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	12	CC:	berrange, clalance, crobinso, itamar, jforbes, psj, ricardo.arguello, veillard, virt-maint
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-03-01 16:18:02 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Joachim Schröder 2010-02-12 20:10:48 UTC

Description of problem:
cloning a virtual guest using a sparse image as virtual disk with virt-manager produces a preallocated image.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
use virt-manager to clone a virt guest that is using a sparse image.

Actual results:
the cloned image is preallocated.

Expected results:
the cloned image is a sparse image.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Paul Jenner 2010-02-27 21:51:55 UTC

Should this be rolled into a duplicate of bug #522720 ?

Comment 2 Cole Robinson 2010-03-01 04:13:24 UTC

Paul, I haven't seen a dup recommendation from you that I haven't liked :) Please feel free to just dup the bugs, someone will undo if they disagree.

Closing as a dup of 522720

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 522720 ***

Comment 3 Joachim Schröder 2010-03-01 08:47:17 UTC

Reopening; please see comment #11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522720#c11 where I have explicitely been asked to open a new bug for libvirt.
Closing this as a dup now would be unproductive ;-)
jos

Comment 4 Cole Robinson 2010-03-01 16:18:02 UTC

Joachim, sorry about the confusion. I actually reassigned that original bug to libvirt with the intent of using it to track the issue I asked you to file in comment #11. I think it's better if we just stick to the original report where there is already a lot of info reported. Thanks for following up though.

Re-duping to 522720

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 522720 ***