Bug 564599

Summary: FTBFS resapplet-0.1.1-9.fc12: ImplicitDSOLinking
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: FTBFS <ftbfs>
Component: resappletAssignee: Radek Vokál <rvokal>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 13CC: rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/mock-results/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-03-23 13:29:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 564245    
Attachments:
Description Flags
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log
none
root.log
none
build.log
none
mock.log
none
Upstream patch for am version of Makefile
none
Patch that adds -lX11 so that the package builds none

Description FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:23 UTC 
resapplet-0.1.1-9.fc12.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information.
This failure is due to a change in the linker default behavior, which uncovered a fault in your package.  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking .
If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug.  Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug.  If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one.  Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies.  (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.  Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
Comment 1 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:26 UTC 
Created attachment 390654 [details]
root.log

root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:27 UTC 
Created attachment 390655 [details]
build.log

build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:28 UTC 
Created attachment 390656 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for i386
Comment 4 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:30 UTC 
Created attachment 390657 [details]
root.log

root.log for x86_64
Comment 5 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:31 UTC 
Created attachment 390658 [details]
build.log

build.log for x86_64
Comment 6 FTBFS 2010-02-13 16:20:32 UTC 
Created attachment 390659 [details]
mock.log

mock.log for x86_64
Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2010-03-15 14:33:19 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 13 development cycle.
Changing version to '13'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 8 Bruno Wolff III 2010-03-23 08:40:01 UTC 
Created attachment 401966 [details]
Upstream patch for am version of Makefile

This one should go upstream so that when autoconf is used a good Makefile.in is made.
Comment 9 Bruno Wolff III 2010-03-23 08:43:09 UTC 
Created attachment 401967 [details]
Patch that adds -lX11 so that the package builds

I think this is good enough and probably a more complicated search for where the X11 stuff is isn't needed or is implied when looking for xrandr.
The spec file will need to be modified to refer to this patch.
Comment 10 Radek Vokál 2010-03-23 13:29:12 UTC 
Thanks a lot. Since the %build runs autoconf, the second patch doesn't make much sense and the first one should do it. It's in rawhide.