Bug 567432

Summary: gdm should not require hal anymore
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt>
Component: gdmAssignee: jmccann
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 13CC: cschalle, jmccann, nsoranzo, rstrode, stephane.demurget
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: gdm-2.29.92-4.fc13 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-17 12:07:39 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Michal Schmidt 2010-02-22 18:28:33 EST
Description of problem:
gdm 2.29.6 already contains the patch "remove remaining traces of Hal"

gdm-2.29.6-1.fc13 still Requires hal though.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Try 'yum remove hal' in F-13.
Actual results:
yum wants to remove gdm too.

Expected results:
gdm should work fine without hal.
Comment 1 Stéphane Démurget 2010-04-17 06:08:19 EDT
I've got gdm-2.29.92-6.fc13.i686 installed and there does not seem to be any dep on hal anymore.
Comment 2 Stéphane Démurget 2010-04-17 06:12:54 EDT
(I mean, a direct dep :p)
Comment 3 Michal Schmidt 2010-04-17 12:07:39 EDT
Yes, the direct dependency on hal was removed in gdm-2.29.92-4.fc13.

That hal is still required by gnome-power-manager and by pm-utils are different bugs.