Bug 569596

Summary: posix_fadvise() handles its arguments incorrectly in 32-bit compat mode. [rhel-5.3.z]
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel>
Component: kernelAssignee: Jiri Pirko <jpirko>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.6CC: clalance, dhoward, emcnabb, john.haxby, jpirko, jwest, plyons, pm-eus, rkhan, tao, wmealing
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-07 07:18:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 559410    
Bug Blocks:    

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-03-01 19:52:58 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #559410 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 3 john.haxby@oracle.com 2010-03-04 17:23:07 UTC 
See bug 554735 for test cases and a proposed patch.
Comment 4 Chris Lalancette 2010-03-05 13:40:10 UTC 
Please note that you'll need the followup patch for the Xen kernel as well.  That was just posted, and should be integrated into the 5.5 kernel soon.

Chris Lalancette
Comment 5 john.haxby@oracle.com 2010-03-05 13:50:56 UTC 
Posted where?   Can I see it?   Is it the same as the xen part of the patch I posted to bug 554735 ?
Comment 6 Chris Lalancette 2010-03-05 22:16:35 UTC 
Posted to internal mailing list for review.  Yes, it's the same as the patch in BZ 554735.

Chris Lalancette
Comment 7 Jiri Pirko 2010-03-23 10:01:48 UTC 
in 2.6.18-128.15.1.el5
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2010-04-07 07:18:07 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0344.html