Bug 569596 - posix_fadvise() handles its arguments incorrectly in 32-bit compat mode. [rhel-5.3.z]
Summary: posix_fadvise() handles its arguments incorrectly in 32-bit compat mode. [rhe...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 5.6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jiri Pirko
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 559410
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-03-01 19:52 UTC by RHEL Program Management
Modified: 2015-05-05 01:19 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-07 07:18:07 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2010:0344 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE kernel bug fix update 2010-04-07 07:04:52 UTC

Description RHEL Program Management 2010-03-01 19:52:58 UTC 
This bug has been copied from bug #559410 and has been proposed
to be backported to 5.3 z-stream (EUS).
Comment 3 john.haxby@oracle.com 2010-03-04 17:23:07 UTC 
See bug 554735 for test cases and a proposed patch.
Comment 4 Chris Lalancette 2010-03-05 13:40:10 UTC 
Please note that you'll need the followup patch for the Xen kernel as well.  That was just posted, and should be integrated into the 5.5 kernel soon.

Chris Lalancette
Comment 5 john.haxby@oracle.com 2010-03-05 13:50:56 UTC 
Posted where?   Can I see it?   Is it the same as the xen part of the patch I posted to bug 554735 ?
Comment 6 Chris Lalancette 2010-03-05 22:16:35 UTC 
Posted to internal mailing list for review.  Yes, it's the same as the patch in BZ 554735.

Chris Lalancette
Comment 7 Jiri Pirko 2010-03-23 10:01:48 UTC 
in 2.6.18-128.15.1.el5
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2010-04-07 07:18:07 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0344.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.