Bug 575425

Summary: bacula-debuginfo 5.0.1-1 lacks sources
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Component: baculaAssignee: Andreas Thienemann <andreas>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: andreas, dnovotny, fschwarz, gwync, jgorig, mmcgrath, rvokal, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: bacula-5.0.2-5.fc13 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-06-23 17:44:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 496968    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, show compiler commands in build log none

Description Ville Skyttä 2010-03-20 17:43:58 UTC
bacula-debuginfo 5.0.1-1 lacks sources, this may be because it might not have been built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS or some other issues, see blocker bug for more possible reasons.

It's hard to tell much at all from the build logs because the build appears to suppress the actual compiler command lines used; I suggest checking if there is some kind of a verbose flag that can be used to prevent that.

Comment 1 Fedora Update System 2010-06-01 20:14:01 UTC
bacula-5.0.2-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.0.2-3.fc13

Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2010-06-02 17:13:39 UTC
Created attachment 419104 [details]
Build with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, show compiler commands in build log

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/bacula/5.0.2/4.fc14/data/logs/x86_64/build.log

debuginfo is no longer empty, but the build still does not show all compiler command lines used, and the few that are shown do not include $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.

Fix for both issues is attached.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2010-06-02 17:19:00 UTC
CCIng Jan.

Jan, if you intend to import your fixes in the very near future, could you include this?  If not, I'll get this in sooner rather than later.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2010-06-02 18:06:40 UTC
bacula-5.0.2-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.0.2-3.fc13

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2010-06-03 12:42:13 UTC
bacula-5.0.2-5.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.0.2-5.fc13

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2010-06-04 18:50:43 UTC
bacula-5.0.2-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bacula-5.0.2-5.fc13

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2010-06-23 17:44:10 UTC
bacula-5.0.2-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2010-06-24 16:32:27 UTC
bacula-5.0.2-5.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.