Bug 578553
Summary: | PartitionException: Too many primary partitions. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Brian Lane <bcl> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | alf, anaconda-maint-list, bcl, jonathan, lord_nestle, optimal_solution2000, redhat-tigerp, stephent98, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | anaconda_trace_hash:0e994a506a0c79e5d8b0043bc6a5ecf293d3eebada40c47fbb4bf0c1f870e3c3 | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-21 20:18:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Attachments: |
Description
Clyde E. Kunkel
2010-03-31 15:52:04 UTC
Created attachment 403774 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
F13B rc2 dvd install on F13 VM. This is a stretch in that I was experimenting with anaconda's raid and VG creation methods and chose to try in a VM. I was trying to create 4 software raid partitions, then a raid 10 device, then a VG on the raid 10 device. It seemed that the partitions were created, however, no matter the method, **within anaconda's partitioner**, I would get a traceback and in tty-2 parted showed only one or the 4 expected raid partitions on /dev/vda and an extended partition that was too small. I got it to work by creating the partitions in tty-2 **before** anaconda looked for devices. Then anaconda saw the partitions and nicely created the raid 10 device and then the VG and LV and installation was normal after that. I do not know if F13 VM is at fault here or if anaconda is at fault or if I am at fault for pressing the software. If I get a chance in the next couple of days, I will try the same initial approach outside of a VM and see what happens. I would lower the severity to low since this is in no way a normal effort. Created attachment 404235 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
(In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=404235) [details] > Attached traceback automatically from anaconda. F13-Beta-RC3 Fedora-13-Beta-x86_64-netinst.iso on a CDRW anaconda 13.37.2 exception report Created attachment 412109 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
Created attachment 412115 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
Created attachment 412162 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
Created attachment 412259 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
Any addition descriptions of preexisting layouts and steps taken would be useful in identifying the factors common among your various cases. Here is a rough example of the kind of description that proves useful when trying to locate the critical factors: I started with two drives. Here's the output of parted -l: .... I chose custom layout, deleted sda3, created a new partition on sda of size XXX and growable with no upper limit. It ended up being sda3. Then I created another partition on sda of fixed size YYY. It ended up being sda5. Then I clicked on "Next", then clicked on "Activate storage" and got this traceback. Too long ago to recall the exact steps, but, I did try to recreate the steps OUTSIDE of a VM and there were no problems. This led me to believe the VM to be the problem. Best I can remember: Create a VM using a single large real partition and point to an .iso for the boot CD. Choose custom parititioning and then create 4 partitions of type software raid, then create a raid 10 device from the 4 partitions and then create a PV from the raid 10 device and then create a single VG and then LVs. If I can, I will try this again and record the steps. Otherwise, not sure it is worth pursuing. Created attachment 423560 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
Created attachment 423561 [details]
Attached traceback automatically from anaconda.
Hi - this is quite close to bug 568219. I have the same issue with anaconda 13.42/i386 System (Dell XPS) has BIOS RAID, with three WIN partions (factory tools, factory restore, win7). Any partitioning scheme (manual w/standard partions (no lvm), lvm auto, lvm review fails, fails with "too many primary partions". I did not find any workaround and basically gave up installation on that system. I tried to prepartition the disk, telling anaconda to replace existing partitions, which led to what follows (prob'ly a separete bug): Traceback (most recent call first): File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/partition_gui.py", line 1070, in populate devstring = device.name File "/usr/lib/anaconda/iw/partition_gui.py", line 1844, in getScreen self.populate(initial = 1) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1393, in setScreen new_screen = self.currentWindow.getScreen(anaconda) File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1405, in setScreen return self.setScreen() File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1314, in nextClicked self.setScreen () AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'name' (full traceback had separately been reported here: [http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.fedoraforum.org%2Fattachment.php%3Fattachmentid%3D19742%26d%3D1277495147&ei=Fj08TIzkD47-OdvG5MQP&usg=AFQjCNESY6NU1mDaHd7ic2N9WNVFL4Pr3A&sig2=a9sl-DTePlck5vAxRunNXQ]) I think the 'PartitionException: Too many primary partitions.' are dupes of bug 568219. If you are still seeing it, please re-open that bug and attach the traceback. I am also seeing 'PartitionException: Can't have overlapping partitions.' in logs from Steve, mohamed and none. Please open a new bug for these. alien, the name problem is bug 584328, please attach your traceback under that bug number. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 568219 *** Created an attachment (id=438829) Attached traceback automatically from anaconda. |