Bug 578873

Summary: Update license tag to BSD
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Matt McCutchen <matt>
Component: arpackAssignee: Axel Thimm <axel.thimm>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: alexl, axel.thimm, mmahut, rpandit, susi.lehtola
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-08 15:41:41 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 182235    

Description Matt McCutchen 2010-04-01 12:08:30 EDT
Description of problem:
Octave, which is licensed under GPLv3+, links with arpack, which is licensed under RiceBSD, which was determined in bug 234191 to be GPL-incompatible.  This is not allowed under the FSF's interpretation that linking creates a derivative work, which Fedora is using.  (I'm pursing this in an effort to help Fedora comply with its own policies, without implying that I think the FSF is right.)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
octave-3.2.3-4.fc12.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf $(ldd /usr/libexec/octave/3.2.3/oct/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/eig.oct \
        | grep arpack | awk '{ print $3 }') --qf '%{LICENSE}\n'
Comment 1 Matt McCutchen 2010-04-01 16:38:55 EDT
David Bateman pointed out in bug 234191 comment 11 that the arpack license has changed to BSD.  So there is no incompatibility; instead, the arpack license tag just needs to be updated in Fedora.
Comment 2 Axel Thimm 2010-04-07 13:07:13 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 234191 ***
Comment 3 Matt McCutchen 2010-04-07 13:14:32 EDT
If you want to dup this to bug 234191, then bug 234191 needs to be reopened and morphed to request the updating of the license tag in Fedora.
Comment 4 Axel Thimm 2010-04-07 14:13:45 EDT
Please check on the bug's status first, there are even builds underway.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 234191 ***
Comment 5 Matt McCutchen 2010-04-07 14:21:11 EDT
Bug 234191's status is CLOSED UPSTREAM.  As I said, it needs to be reopened before marking this one as a duplicate.  I would do that, but I don't have editbugs.
Comment 6 Alex Lancaster 2010-04-08 15:41:41 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> Bug 234191's status is CLOSED UPSTREAM.  As I said, it needs to be reopened
> before marking this one as a duplicate.  I would do that, but I don't have
> editbugs.    

Fixing this as a dupe, and will re-open the other.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 234191 ***