Bug 580319
Summary: | Review Request: gretl - Gnu Regression, Econometrics and Time-series Library | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Lee Mitchell <LeeMitchell.fedora> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, johannes.lips, lemenkov, martin.gieseking, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-09-06 16:21:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Lee Mitchell
2010-04-08 00:12:16 UTC
I recommend www.dropbox.com to place specs and srpms. Using the link below will give you and me both 250 MB of bonus space. https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTEzMzgxOTc5 Lee, at least you can attach spec-file right here. (In reply to comment #1) > I recommend www.dropbox.com to place specs and srpms. > > Using the link below will give you and me both 250 MB of bonus space. > https://www.dropbox.com/referrals/NTEzMzgxOTc5 Thank you, Chen. I did use your referal link. (In reply to comment #2) > Lee, at least you can attach spec-file right here. Peter, I want to pretty it up before I post. Hopefully this weekend. Please note that I have put NotReady on the whiteboard. thx, Lee Since there weren't any developments on this bug report I filed another one. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628202 Hannes, did you ask Lee whether he's still interested in maintaining gretl? Usually, you should take over a package without asking for permission. As far as I see, Lee isn't a member of the packager group yet. Thus, this bug should have been blocked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. (In reply to comment #6) > Usually, you should take over a package without asking for permission. I meant: you should NOT take over a package without asking for permission. :) No I didn't ask him but I wouldn't bother if he is interested in maintaining it. I will not stick to it like glue if he likes to finish the work. I just thought that it would be good to get gretl into fedora. Since there wasn't really any spec or something in here I didn't think that I overtake this package because there was nothing I could use. Perhaps we should just wait a bit if he is showing up and then talk to him what he wants to do. I didn't want to offend him or anyone else, just want to do some packaging of programs which are useful for me. Best Regards (In reply to comment #8) > Since there wasn't > really any spec or something in here I didn't think that I overtake this > package because there was nothing I could use. As long as a review request hasn't been closed, the corresponding (potential) package is assigned to the submitter, even if there's no working SRPM yet. However, the submitter should of course provide some reviewable files in a timely manner, or he should close the ticket if he's no longer interested. > I didn't want to offend him or anyone else, just want to do some packaging of > programs which are useful for me. That's fine, and it's great that you care. Let's just wait for a response before we take action here. Since we didn't get a response within a week, I'm closing here. Lee, if you're still interested in joining the packager group, feel free to submit another package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 628202 *** |