|Summary:||Move udisks bash completion to /etc/bash_completion.d|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>|
|Component:||udisks||Assignee:||Dan Mashal <dan.mashal>|
|Status:||CLOSED RAWHIDE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||udisks-1.0.4-11||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-02-26 19:43:35 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Ville Skyttä 2010-04-21 21:03:52 UTC
All the packages I know that install bash completions install them in /etc/bash_completion.d. I suggest changing udisks to do that as well (remember to own the /etc/bash_completion.d dir and not have a dependency on bash-completion). Off topic, for upstream: no need to set up completion in non-interactive mode: -[ -z "$BASH_VERSION" ] && return +[ -z "$BASH_VERSION" -o -z "$PS1" ] && return
Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2010-07-30 11:26:03 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 14 development cycle. Changing version to '14'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2011-09-08 16:53:16 UTC
Upstream patches submitted: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40722 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40723
Comment 3 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2013-02-24 10:45:14 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Comment 4 Dan Mashal 2013-02-25 04:21:47 UTC
Fixed in rawhide (fc19). Will try to fix for f18 and f17.
Comment 5 Ville Skyttä 2013-02-25 08:51:21 UTC
Not fixed, the file is still incorrectly in /etc/profile.d and not /etc/bash_completion.d, see initial comment. Looks like only the "off topic" change was done.
Comment 6 Dan Mashal 2013-02-25 15:31:17 UTC
Got it. I don't have commit rights for fc18 but the partial fix was done for fc18 and fc19 and it seemed to work better but I will finish the fix.
Comment 7 Ville Skyttä 2013-02-25 20:50:58 UTC
I have the needed commit rights, let me know if you'd like me to take care of this (and if, for which branches).
Comment 8 Dan Mashal 2013-02-26 03:39:40 UTC
If you have the commit rights go for it, all branches.
Comment 9 Ville Skyttä 2013-02-26 19:43:35 UTC
F17 has some other differences to F18 and I don't think this is serious enough to warrant a F17 update alone, so I committed and built F18+ only. Actually I don't think this is serious enough to warrant a F18 update alone either, so I didn't submit the bodhi update because there wasn't one for the previous build either.