Bug 587524
Summary: | /etc/init.d/ldap is not LSB compliant | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Achim Stumpf <hakim.news> |
Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Jan Zeleny <jzeleny> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | jplans |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-04-30 07:18:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Achim Stumpf
2010-04-30 06:56:25 UTC
Sorry, I have posted this already in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4293 Here I got the advice to post it in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587210 Here I got the advice to install a rhel 6 beta, and if this issue persists I should report here. My company has a support contract for rhel. If this might help here ;o) As I stated in original bug, this issue has been already fixed in Fedora 12, from which RHEL6 is derived. Feel free to reopen the bug if you find that the issue hasn't really been fixed. I'm closing it as duplicate for now. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 587210 *** Sorry, I have posted this already in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4293 Here I got the advice to post it in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587210 Here I got the advice to install a rhel 6 beta, and if this issue persists I should report here. Sorry I haven't a installation of rhel 6. And this story costs me to much time just to address this bug. I have searched around, but haven't found anything where someone fixed this issue for rhel. Please check... My company has a support contract for rhel. If this might help here ;o) Ok if it is fixed, I am fine with that. Sorry for my bad english, but I understood in the other thread, that yu are not sure if this is fixed. This seems to be done then... No problem - my point was that the issue is fixed (it passed internal test written by our QA), but of course you might have different test which can detect anomaly unlisted in Fedora guidelines. If you happen to find something that you think is an issue, please file a new bug for it, so we can discuss it further. But in this case sooner is better - once RHEL6 reaches beta2, it will be difficult to get init script change into it. I will ask my managers to give me time for that. But can't promise yet... |