Bug 587210
| Summary: | /etc/init.d/ldap is not LSB compliant | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Achim Stumpf <hakim.news> |
| Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Jan Zeleny <jzeleny> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 5.4 | CC: | jplans, ralph |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-04-29 13:15:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Achim Stumpf
2010-04-29 11:44:02 UTC
Got the advice to report this bug here from Centos: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4293 This issue won't be addressed in RHEL5. The reason is obvious - users might already use their own scripts which depend on current behavior. Feel free to test latest Fedora or RHEL6 beta1, the issue should be already fixed there. Please could you move this to the rhel6 queue with status new. I don't have the permission to do this. Or are you expecting now that I open a new Bug report in the rhel6 queue? for me it seems that this bug is not fixed in rhel6, could not find anything. If you tested openldap in RHEL-6 beta and you found that it doesn't follow Fedora guidelines (they are based on LSB), please file a new bug with description what part doesn't follow guidelines. Thanks I don't have the time to install rhel6 beta. My customer is not paying anymore. And I have opened a bugreport on centos, they gave me the advice to report it on rhel, now you guys tell me that ... This is a lot of time to report a bug. In real open source distributions this is much simpler and not so time costing... ;o) My point for the installing and testing was that the bug was already fixed, as I told you in comment 2. So you've opened unnecessary bug. *** Bug 587524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Sorry for my bad english, but I understood that you are not sure if this is fixed. |