Bug 587883
| Summary: | boolstuff 0.1.13 is out | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
| Component: | boolstuff | Assignee: | Conrad Meyer <cse.cem+redhatbugz> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | cse.cem+redhatbugz, pertusus |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-05-01 19:43:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Patrice Dumas
2010-05-01 10:46:48 UTC
Ok, I've removed those patches and it seems to build fine locally. The package has been updated in rawhide ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2154177 ) and F-13 ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2154192 ) and F-12 ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2154195 ). Have you checked that the API and ABI didn't changed for the older releases? I vaguely remember at least a change in API. $ repoquery --whatrequires boolstuff boolstuff-devel-0:0.1.11-8.fc12.i686 booldnf-0:0.1.11-8.fc12.x86_64 boolstuff-devel-0:0.1.11-8.fc12.x86_64 Those are all RPMs from the boolstuff SRPM. I am happy to not push the bump to F-12, but it should go to F-13, IMO. (In reply to comment #3) > $ repoquery --whatrequires boolstuff > boolstuff-devel-0:0.1.11-8.fc12.i686 > booldnf-0:0.1.11-8.fc12.x86_64 > boolstuff-devel-0:0.1.11-8.fc12.x86_64 > > Those are all RPMs from the boolstuff SRPM. you should better do something along repoquery --archlist=src --whatrequires boolstuff-devel or repoquery --whatrequires libboolstuff-0.1.so.0 At least halevt requires boolstuff-devel. I guess it is the only dependency. (In reply to comment #4) > I am happy to not push the bump to F-12, but it should go to F-13, IMO. I tend to disagree, changing API/ABI after the branching seems wrong to me. But you are the maintainer, it is your choice. F-13 hasn't been released yet; I don't see the harm in upgrading if it doesn't break halevt (which doesn't exist in F-12). halevt indeed exists in F-12. Or there is something weird going on. The halevt version in fedora is quite old, though. Newer version requires indeed boolstuff 0.1.12 at least because of the API change I talked about. In fact this could even be a reason for updating in F-13, such that it is possible to rebuild newer halevt versions. Er, sorry, I misunderstood. halevt doesn't appear to depend on boolstuff in F-12. (In reply to comment #9) > Er, sorry, I misunderstood. halevt doesn't appear to depend on boolstuff in > F-12. That would be quite strange. Are you sure it doesn't depend on boolstuff soname, which should be like libboolstuff-0.1.so.0? The command:
> repoquery --whatrequires libboolstuff-0.1.so.0
wasn't giving me anything earlier; however:
$ repoquery -qR halevt
reports that it does, indeed, require libboolstuff-0.1.so.0()(64bit)
@Patrice: Shall we get a buildroot override and bump halevt in F-13 then? That would certainly be good. But maybe you could send a mail to the current halevt owner (or to the generic fedora halevt-owner mail alias) before processing. |