Bug 588446

Summary:	Review Request: rubygem-net-sftp sftp support for Ruby
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Adam Young <ayoung>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, jesusr, mastahnke, notting
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-10-13 18:42:26 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	588461, 602348
Bug Blocks:	588406

Description Adam Young 2010-05-03 18:11:32 UTC

Spec URL: <spec info here>
SRPM URL: http://admiyo.fedorapeople.org/buildr-repo/rubygem-net-sftp-2.0.4-1.young.src.rpm
Description: sftp support for Ruby

Comment 1 Michael Stahnke 2010-08-30 01:16:26 UTC

warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/CHANGELOG.rdoc
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/README.rdoc
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/constants.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/errors.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/operations/dir.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/operations/download.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/operations/file.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/operations/file_factory.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/operations/upload.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/packet.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/01/attributes.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/01/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/01/name.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/02/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/03/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/04/attributes.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/04/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/04/name.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/05/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/06/attributes.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/06/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/protocol/base.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/request.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/response.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/session.rb
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/net-sftp-2.0.4/lib/net/sftp/version.rb



It looks like you might want to break the package into the base package and a -doc package.  This was discussed recently on the Ruby SIG list.

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2010-10-13 18:42:26 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 642524 ***