Bug 588663

Summary: [abrt] crash in kernel: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:117 resched_task+0x58/0x70() (Tainted: G D )
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Ales Zelinka <azelinka>
Component: kernelAssignee: Red Hat Kernel Manager <kernel-mgr>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 6.0CC: esandeen, prarit
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:1321833982
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-05 09:12:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Description Flags
File: kerneloops none

Description Ales Zelinka 2010-05-04 08:51:20 UTC
abrt 1.0.7 detected a crash.

architecture: i686
cmdline: not_applicable
comment: Resumed from suspend2ram. Lenovo T61 in dock
component: kernel
executable: kernel
kernel: 2.6.32-23.el6.i686
Attached file: kerneloops
package: kernel
reason: ------------[ cut here ]------------
release: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation release 6.0 Beta (Santiago)

Comment 1 Ales Zelinka 2010-05-04 08:51:23 UTC
Created attachment 411222 [details]
File: kerneloops

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2010-05-04 10:59:22 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release.  Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release.  This request is not yet committed for

Comment 4 Eric Sandeen 2010-05-04 16:31:40 UTC
The "D" taint means it oopsed before, and looks like abrt picked up the wrong one.

This is likely a dup of bug #586967 but if you can look for a prior oops that might help confirm it.

Comment 5 Ales Zelinka 2010-05-05 09:12:15 UTC
Indeed it it (comparing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586967#c17 with my logs). Closing as duplicate. Eric, thanks for figuring this out.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 586967 ***