Bug 589868

Summary:	Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Edouard Bourguignon <madko>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, ibrahimeser, kryzhev, madko, mail, notting, pahan, philippe.moret, thibault.north
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	565666	Environment:
Last Closed:	2010-05-07 09:39:56 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	565666
Bug Blocks:

Description Edouard Bourguignon 2010-05-07 07:15:10 UTC

This is a new review request for darktable since the original demand by ibrahim eser was closed (cf bug #565666).

Description:  
darktable is a virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers: it manages
your digital negatives in a database and lets you view them through a zoomable
lighttable. It also enables you to develop raw images and enhance them. 

Here are my specs and rpms:
http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/darktable.spec
http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/darktable-0.5-2.fc12.src.rpm

But some Errors and warnings remain:

darktable.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libdarktable.so libdarktable.so
darktable.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdarktable.so
exit.5
darktable.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/darktable
['/usr/lib64']
darktable.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/darktable.schemas
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.

But not sure how to fix them. Any idea?

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2010-05-07 09:39:56 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 589866 ***