Bug 589868 - Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Summary: Review Request: darktable - Utility to organize and develop raw images
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 589866
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On: 565666
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-05-07 07:15 UTC by Edouard Bourguignon
Modified: 2010-05-07 09:39 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 565666
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-07 09:39:56 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Edouard Bourguignon 2010-05-07 07:15:10 UTC
This is a new review request for darktable since the original demand by ibrahim eser was closed (cf bug #565666).

Description:  
darktable is a virtual lighttable and darkroom for photographers: it manages
your digital negatives in a database and lets you view them through a zoomable
lighttable. It also enables you to develop raw images and enhance them. 

Here are my specs and rpms:
http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/darktable.spec
http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/darktable-0.5-2.fc12.src.rpm

But some Errors and warnings remain:

darktable.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libdarktable.so libdarktable.so
darktable.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libdarktable.so
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
darktable.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/darktable
['/usr/lib64']
darktable.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/darktable.schemas
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.

But not sure how to fix them. Any idea?

Comment 1 Peter Lemenkov 2010-05-07 09:39:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 589866 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.