Bug 590473
Summary: | Review Request: recoll - a desktop full text search tool with a Qt GUI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jean-Francois Dockes <jfd> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting, sanjay.ankur, sochotni, supercyper1, terje.rosten |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-08 20:51:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jean-Francois Dockes
2010-05-09 18:01:52 UTC
I did some work on this package some time ago. I ported that work to your package, including these changes: - use version macro in source url - don't strip bins, giving non empty debuginfo package - more explicit file listing - try to preserve timestamps - use proper name for spec file - fix changelog - license seems to be GPLv2+ - include some %%doc files - add buildroot tag - some source has execute bit set - explicit enable inotify - add aspell-devel to bulldreq - make with _smp_mflags seems to work - add post scripts - add patch to build gui with correct flags (ref: 338791) spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/recoll/recoll.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/recoll/recoll-1.13.04-3.fc12.src.rpm Feel free to improve further. Thanks for the improvements, they're all ok with me. To reviewers: please use the new URLs above for review, I'll use these files as the base for further maintenance and updates. Group: Applications/Databases (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for the improvements, they're all ok with me. > > To reviewers: please use the new URLs above for review, I'll use these files as > the base for further maintenance and updates. Are you already sponsored or do you need a sponsor? See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process I am just guessing you are not sponsored from your mentioning of being upstream developer of recoll. In that case, please add appropriate blocker bug for FE-NEEDSPONSOR hi, if it's a FE-NEEDSPONSOR, I can't take it up, you need a sponsor. Reverting to NEW. Ankur As discussed with Jean-Francois, closing this as dup. Ankur, please consider to review the new ticket, thanks. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 612719 *** |