Bug 591335
| Summary: | IPv6 tproxy support is not present in RHEL 6 Beta | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Kapil Dakhane <kdakhane> | ||||
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Thomas Graf <tgraf> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hangbin Liu <haliu> | ||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||
| Version: | 6.0 | CC: | dtian, haliu, jwest, nkim, rbinkhor, rkhan, rruban, snagar, syeghiay, tgraf | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | kernel-2.6.32-121.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-05-23 20:21:18 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 590186, 590187 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for inclusion. This issue has been proposed when we are only considering blocker issues in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. It has been denied for the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. ** If you would still like this issue considered for the current release, ask your support representative to file as a blocker on your behalf. Otherwise ask that it be considered for the next Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. ** Is the patch merged upstream? Yes, this is upstream. Patch was merged in commit e84392707e10301b93121e1b74e2823db50cdf9e. Thanks Thomas The RHEL6 kernel tree already includes the latest revision of TPROXY except for two minor cosmetic commits not affecting behaviour. What is the status of the iptables package WRT tproxy? I just noticed that this RFE asks for IPv6 support in TPROXY exclusively which isn't even implemented upstream yet. I misread this assuming it only requested the upstream TPROXY code to be back ported. I think we have to NACK this. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. This request is being deferred to RHEL 6.1 pending inclusion of the Balabit patches referenced in Comment #0 in the upstream kernel. Upstream integration of this feature will be discussed at the netfilter summit in October 2010. Actual integration planned for November. Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-112.el6 Created attachment 479228 [details]
RHEL6 backport of ipv6: Implement Any-IP support for IPv6.
Backport of ab79ad14a2d51e95f0ac3cef7cd116a57089ba82
Patch(es) available on kernel-2.6.32-121.el6 An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0542.html |
Description of problem: The IPv6 transparency has already been implemented and Bytemobile has verified that it works correctly. It is available at: http://git.balabit.hu/?p=bazsi/tproxy-2.6.git;a=summary This was verified by running ip6tables command to set mangle rules: ip6tables --table mangle --append PREROUTING --in-interface eth2.39 --protocol tcp --destination ::0/0 --destination-port 0:65535 --jump TPROXY --tproxy-mark 0x1/0xFFFFFFFF --on-ip fdfd:6b2a:f17e::c0a8:2701 --on-port 4101 This gives following output: ip6tables v1.4.6: unknown option `--tproxy-mark' Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information. FYI, We require this feature to claim that our product is IPv6 compliant. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.4.6 How reproducible: Happens everytime. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Setup an ipv6 address for an interface 2. Issue above mentioned command 3. Actual results: ip6tables v1.4.6: unknown option `--tproxy-mark' Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information. Expected results: Command is accepted and IPv6 transparency works. Additional info: According to a reply on support Service Request # 2018648 : 07-MAY-2010 17:00:32 Ruban, Ranjith Hello I was able to see RFE filed to add tproxy to rhel 6 but currently the rhel 6 beta does not seem to have support for (v6) tproxy and the option --tproxy-mark . Since rhel 6 beta is not a supported release would it be possible for you to file a bugzilla regarding this case.