Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
The IPv6 transparency has already been implemented and Bytemobile has verified that it works correctly. It is available at:
http://git.balabit.hu/?p=bazsi/tproxy-2.6.git;a=summary
This was verified by running ip6tables command to set mangle rules:
ip6tables --table mangle --append PREROUTING --in-interface eth2.39 --protocol tcp --destination ::0/0 --destination-port 0:65535 --jump TPROXY --tproxy-mark 0x1/0xFFFFFFFF --on-ip fdfd:6b2a:f17e::c0a8:2701 --on-port 4101
This gives following output:
ip6tables v1.4.6: unknown option `--tproxy-mark'
Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information.
FYI, We require this feature to claim that our product is IPv6 compliant.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.4.6
How reproducible:
Happens everytime.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Setup an ipv6 address for an interface
2. Issue above mentioned command
3.
Actual results:
ip6tables v1.4.6: unknown option `--tproxy-mark'
Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information.
Expected results:
Command is accepted and IPv6 transparency works.
Additional info:
According to a reply on support Service Request # 2018648 :
07-MAY-2010 17:00:32 Ruban, Ranjith
Hello
I was able to see RFE filed to add tproxy to rhel 6 but currently the rhel 6 beta does not seem to have support for (v6) tproxy and the option --tproxy-mark . Since rhel 6 beta is not a supported release would it be possible for you to file a bugzilla regarding this case.
Comment 2RHEL Program Management
2010-05-08 01:35:41 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux major release. Product Management has requested further
review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Major release. This request is not yet committed for
inclusion.
According to the netfilter-devel mailing list, there is still work to do on the netfilter kernel modules. The code is not accepted upstream.
Please open an extra bugzilla entry for kernel and make this one depend on the kernel bug.
Thanks, Thomas
Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
New Contents:
Cause:
Consequence:
Fix:
Result:
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0557.html
Description of problem: The IPv6 transparency has already been implemented and Bytemobile has verified that it works correctly. It is available at: http://git.balabit.hu/?p=bazsi/tproxy-2.6.git;a=summary This was verified by running ip6tables command to set mangle rules: ip6tables --table mangle --append PREROUTING --in-interface eth2.39 --protocol tcp --destination ::0/0 --destination-port 0:65535 --jump TPROXY --tproxy-mark 0x1/0xFFFFFFFF --on-ip fdfd:6b2a:f17e::c0a8:2701 --on-port 4101 This gives following output: ip6tables v1.4.6: unknown option `--tproxy-mark' Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information. FYI, We require this feature to claim that our product is IPv6 compliant. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.4.6 How reproducible: Happens everytime. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Setup an ipv6 address for an interface 2. Issue above mentioned command 3. Actual results: ip6tables v1.4.6: unknown option `--tproxy-mark' Try `ip6tables -h' or 'ip6tables --help' for more information. Expected results: Command is accepted and IPv6 transparency works. Additional info: According to a reply on support Service Request # 2018648 : 07-MAY-2010 17:00:32 Ruban, Ranjith Hello I was able to see RFE filed to add tproxy to rhel 6 but currently the rhel 6 beta does not seem to have support for (v6) tproxy and the option --tproxy-mark . Since rhel 6 beta is not a supported release would it be possible for you to file a bugzilla regarding this case.