Bug 593668

Summary: [abrt] crash in evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12: __strcmp_ssse3: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: c_w_sutherland
Component: evolution-exchangeAssignee: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 12CC: mbarnes, mcrha
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:29d1784040f957f29ac746437c0e6450b755843f
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-05-25 09:42:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace none

Description c_w_sutherland 2010-05-19 12:57:19 UTC 
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.

architecture: x86_64
Attached file: backtrace
cmdline: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage --oaf-activate-iid=OAFIID:GNOME_Evolution_Exchange_Component_Factory:2.28 --oaf-ior-fd=31
comment: Evolution just sitting idle, evolution --force-shutdown is only was to restore connection
component: evolution-exchange
crash_function: __strcmp_ssse3
executable: /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage
global_uuid: 29d1784040f957f29ac746437c0e6450b755843f
kernel: 2.6.32.11-99.fc12.x86_64
package: evolution-exchange-2.28.3-1.fc12
rating: 4
reason: Process /usr/libexec/evolution/2.28/evolution-exchange-storage was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)

How to reproduce
-----
2.
3.
Comment 1 c_w_sutherland 2010-05-19 12:57:24 UTC 
Created attachment 415099 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:42:37 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 563425 ***
Comment 3 Karel Klíč 2010-05-25 09:42:37 UTC 
This bug appears to have been filled using a buggy version of ABRT, because
it contains a backtrace which is a duplicate of backtrace from bug #563425.

Sorry for the inconvenience.