Bug 595551
| Summary: | Review Request: ibus-table-mathwriter - ibus-table-mathwriter provides input method for writing Unicode Math symbols | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Naveen Kumar <nkumar> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, i18n-bugs, K9, notting, pnemade, supercyper1 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | i18n |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-09-09 05:48:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 597035 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Naveen Kumar
2010-05-24 23:21:14 UTC
Hey Naveen, As this is a GPLv3 licensed table, how about include that into ibus-table-others? http://github.com/kaio/ibus-table-others/ I could add you commit permissions to the repository and pkgdb (once that is approved for CVS). (In reply to comment #1) > Hey Naveen, > > As this is a GPLv3 licensed table, how about include that into > ibus-table-others? > > http://github.com/kaio/ibus-table-others/ > > I could add you commit permissions to the repository and pkgdb (once that is > approved for CVS). Hi Kaio, Sorry for replying late as I was on a leave for some time. I do not have any issues with adding it (ibus-table-mathwriter) to ibus-table-others. But I would need access (checkout & commit) to this table as the work is not fully complete yet. Also there is also something that I would like to add, that I might write an engine for mathematical input method using ibus API's in near future. In that case I would like you to suggest me the best possible course whether to merge it with ibus-table-others or keep it as a separate package.
>
> Also there is also something that I would like to add, that I might write an
> engine for mathematical input method using ibus API's in near future. In that
> case I would like you to suggest me the best possible course whether to merge
> it with ibus-table-others or keep it as a separate package.
If you want to write an new engine for ibus, then ibus-table-mathwriter seems not a proper name for this new engine. You may need another name for this package.
(In reply to comment #3) > > > > Also there is also something that I would like to add, that I might write an > > engine for mathematical input method using ibus API's in near future. In that > > case I would like you to suggest me the best possible course whether to merge > > it with ibus-table-others or keep it as a separate package. > > If you want to write an new engine for ibus, then ibus-table-mathwriter seems > not a proper name for this new engine. You may need another name for this > package. Yep, I think for the time being let us move it to ibus-table-others as I am not certain of writing it now. I will package it with different name then, because then it would be more than ibus-table-* & probably the behaviour & table format may also not be the same. @kaio Please direct me with the next step. In that case probably you could close this bug or reassign it to ibus-table-other to track the progress. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 630932 *** |